Tag Archives: civil rights

The Daily Blog – Martyn Bradbury – The thing I hate most about NZ Suicide

I have just seen this blog post by Martyn and was very angry with him because I was blocked from commenting on his blog over two years ago when I am one of those people who is suicidal and PROTEST MY ARSE OFF telling people WHY.  That includes all health services, social services AND DAVE MCPHERSON – who also blocked me for my TRUTHFUL CHALLENGING COMMENTS.

The thing I hate most about NZ Suicide – we never dare ask why

Nobody from any formal or informal media organisation will support me or tell my story, TDB are more interested in giving Dave McPherson a voice, who for all we know could have been instrumental in driving his son to suicide through extremely bad parenting!!!!

I am so sick of people like Martyn making comment about suicide WHEN HE HAS ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT.   His comment that people like me are on the fringes of society and not asking why suicide is happening, is inaccurate and he has done to me, exactly what he is criticising in this blog post.   Lost and very lost – we’re not lost we’re marginalised, terrorised and oppressed.  The way liberals like to trivialise the situation is very upsetting and causes me all sorts of problems when I am protesting – cause nobody believes me.

Honestly its like all people in positions of influence have completely lost the plot, even the ones who supposed to be on the side of right and justice.    Another reason to dislike the concept of left right and centre in describing politics – IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH politics WHATSOEVER.

So if you or a friend of yours ends up reading this Martyn, can you please get hold of me and tell my story.  I have several impending minor criminal charges related to my civil society activism in the area of suicide/mental health services, justice etc.  So there will be restrictions, I’m sure you know better than me how to overcome them.

All this for just wanting the ACC care (as a victim of crime) I won two court cases to receive in 2010/11 and still don’t have – so I can return to work and not live in degrading poverty, in unsafe, unstable unaffordable private rental accommodation with no dignity when forced to beg for food etc.

 

Carterton District Council, New Zealand

 

18 July 2019

 

Mayor, Councillors and CEO

Carterton District Council

Holloway Street

CARTERTON

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

RE: DEMOCRACY/COUNCIL REPORTS AREA OF LIBRARY

I have recently been trying to familiarise myself with the Carterton Council accounts and operations. This has not been easy, it is so complicated and in such disarray I felt compelled to write this letter of complaint and of course solutions.

 

The area I was directed to was one poorly organised shelving unit beside the huge toy library area. I was looking at reports from 14 years ago. I asked staff about the current relevance of some documents, they had no idea. Since then I have found out they were obsolete around 10 years ago. What were they still doing there? How many are still there.

 

Council/library/events centre public employees are well trained in toy sleepovers and providing for children and tourist enjoyment. I believe their time and resources would be better spent on a community knowledgeable in the area of democratic process, rather than promoting wearing of gumboots as FALSE HOPE. This would give better value for money to ALL ratepayers and EVERYBODY’S hope for wellbeing. As an oppressed UN Civil Society Activist in the area of mental health and neo-liberalism it would be a huge help to me – ignorance is my greatest enemy.

 

This ‘democracy/government’ area of the library/events centre needs to be much bigger, more inviting and interactive for people. There are videos already available and we could make our own instructional videos for people to play and find out about participating in democracy. People don’t even understand what a democracy is, or what politics/political parties etc are either (eg socialism, capitalism, neo-liberalism) or how those people and beliefs impact on their day to day lives. We could have posters/charts etc which showed how things worked overall and on a small scale, all along the wall – with links to online information as well. The Council building does not have the facility, nor staff who are respected/trusted enough, for this information to be disseminated from there.

 

I have begun to wonder why the Events Centre has a huge area of display for tourists, new residents and children, while majority of LOCAL RATE PAYERS who fund this get NOTHING from it. I completely reject the idea overwhelming tourism and huge numbers of new residents are good for any local community or our finite planet.

 

We all know people are being driven mad and killing themselves, driven from the area or into dangerous situations, resorting to crime to survive or becoming overwhelmed with addictions and harming those they supposed to care about under this extremist neo-liberal economic model (which is also illegal from my research). There is now extensive reliable information on the internet and a world-wide backlash against this failed economic experiment. Sadly the very powerful and rich people who profit from it are NEVER EVER going to give up their excesses without direct and lawful action from those who suffer under it.

 

An urgent large scale project to establish this display would be extremely useful in the run up to the local body elections. I am sure privileged children and other non-essential activities could be deferred while this area is reconstructed, without using extravagant costly marketing ideas or requiring new equipment.

 

Residents could ask questions directly of current councillors or people running for council, look these people in the eye and be able to shake their hand. Rate payers could meet at the library to talk to councillors/candidates about their concerns and see what ideas they have for solving them. Maybe a schedule for the day/week? See if we can organise some debates and 10-20min speeches, this should be a council DUTY in a democracy. (Has anything been organised?)

 

These meetings could be live streamed if appropriate (just like Jill Greathead did for the Wairarapa Voice political group – who subjected me to horrendous discrimination and insults about my disability and civil right to freely participate and disseminate information in a public propaganda meeting attended by the Business Round Table/NZ Initiative, Swiss Ambassador, LGNZ – a propaganda organisation for neo-liberal mayors and NZ First).

 

There is democracy information online, however to access it requires a significant amount of skill, knowledge and guidance about where to go.   A new bright modern clear display would bring attention to this vital information of how a government and democracy works. People like myself who understand more of the process, are most interested in reading the details in reports and to know where to look for information and answers to valid serious questions. From personal experience mainstream media do not provide that information or opportunity.

 

There needs to be a MUCH BETTER filing system, and it needs to be kept current. I believe this would be extremely beneficial to the wellbeing and essential education of our community. I know the majority of citizens currently participating in democracy are affluent educated ‘professional’ people, only concerned with themselves, their businesses, families and their neo-liberal ideology. NOTE: Neo-liberals believe in forcing disabled and under/unemployed people without their own home/land, to beg for shelter, justice and food from charities. Over the past 30 years New Zealand has proven without doubt this is undignified and DESTROYS WELLBEING, it does not improve it!

 

We are No 5 in OECD for suicide, No 1 for youth suicide, women self-harming, domestic/flatmate violence and homelessness. Where once we were one of the most socially advanced, peaceful, ‘civilised’ countries on the planet we have regressed over 800 years to be one of the most socially depraved, violent, dysfunctional and uncivilised. Please refer to the most recent laws that have denigrated citizens Magna Carta rights – via Legislation NZ website).

 

I would like to see well presented ratified copies of UN treaties on Economic Social & Cultural Rights, Human Rights, Disabled Rights, Against psychological Torture and of course Civil Rights (which I have serious issues with at the moment). There are also many New Zealand constitutional laws which local and central government are defined/controlled by, they are only useful if those being ‘harmed’ know what they are and how to use them, which is the most important part of being a citizen in a democracy. There should also be hard copies of these treaties and laws available for people to take with them for free, nothing extravagant (just photocopies).

 

The business of democracy is a serious one, which involves unnecessary suffering and deaths of citizens, destruction of ‘Kiwi’ cultural rights and traditions, homelessness, poverty, inciting racism and bigotry, domestic violence, unemployment, suicide, crime and more. This display should be treated with the same seriousness to reflect that, eg not set out in a ‘child like’ way. And definitely not set out to misinform citizens that we currently have a well functioning democracy and government, because we definitely DO NOT.

 

Knowing from personal experience how ineffective current wellbeing and democracy services and library staff are, there will need to be extensive education in this area. Working on this democracy project might be sufficient to educate staff so they know how to answer ratepayer questions. Relying solely on a computer to provide the information is not appropriate or effective, which is reflected in the horrendous state of our community and society.   That is something I am aware of from my perspective as an intelligent educated disabled person rotting in poverty, on welfare being denied health care, welfare, housing and justice services required under New Zealand and international law.

 

Much of my knowledge, anger, unwellness and resentment comes from knowing the history of government, ‘socialist type laws’ and democracy in New Zealand. It is vitally important to show people comparisons and time-lines of when some of our unique constitutional laws were introduced, especially those that attempted to make us all one people in the most just, egalitarian ‘civilised’ country on earth. The fight against wealthy global elites who exploit peasant citizens for their own advancement is very old. That our country adopted their preferred extremist neo-liberal economic model is deeply distressing and of course achieved exactly what these cruel greedy powerful families wanted. Uncivilised societies will always revert to their most basic instinct of survival of the fittest – especially when their most basic human needs for safety, work, shelter and food security are removed.

 

Given my extensive knowledge of law, disability and the role of government in a democracy I am sure I could be of use to those developing this exhibit/information hub. It is crucial nothing important is left out and it is presented in a way that 80% of adult rate payers are able to understand and USE effectively. I don’t think hidden behind a column right beside the toy library is an appropriate place – after all children don’t pay rates and these topics are far beyond their comprehension and/or responsibility.   There are extensive areas for young people in the events centre/library, which from my personal observation are not used for anything important.

 

The excessive amounts of public money going into technology at the library has been most effective in improving the gaming experience for children and isolating people further with laptops. I apply the saying ‘garbage in, garbage out’, distracting children and adults with fictional stories, those things which aren’t important and manipulative ‘games’ is having a serious adverse impact on democracy and wellbeing in our society.

 

I vehemently disagree with the current neo-liberal controlled ‘Labour’ government, who have yet again dumped responsibility for solving the serious failures with their economic model onto ‘the community’ – ie wellbeing. There is absolutely NOTHING we can do locally about an extremist illegal form of economics that essentially advances globalist rich ‘big business’ people, while disadvantaging local small to medium sized businesses and further terrorising and profiting from the poorest 20-40% of our population.

 

Mayor John Booth and others have expressed how great it is that wellbeing has been put back in the hands of locals. From personal experience I know things are only going to get worse for me and others like me. I know the ignorance, bigotry and hate majority of people in this community have towards people who don’t work (or don’t have enough work), have disabilities between the ages of 17 and 70 years old, are victims of violent crimes and being denied extensive ACC/health care, welfare, homes and justice they are entitled to from central government under law. I know how badly women who have all their basic needs for safety, shelter and food security met, treat women like me who don’t.

 

I have no access the current myriad of ‘wellbeing’ religious, social enterprises, government and charity organisation and am in fact defamed, degraded, rejected, marginalised and police are used to terrorise me instead. Terrorise me for asking for the professional health care, welfare, housing and justice I am entitled to under multiple laws and court decisions. I am then further rejected and ignored because I am now a dysfunctional reflection of what is happening to me (a situation author and journalist Chris Hedges calls Anomie). Although my case is severe and extremely telling as to the levels of corruption and dysfunction within our current democracy. The only reason I don’t act on the suicidal ideation I now live with as a result of the harm I have been subjected to, is my concern for my fellow man and knowing cruel people associated with our government purposely drive me to suicide to silence me and what I say.

 

As an impoverished disabled artist, poet and intellectual, left to rot on welfare by ACC and others, it is my duty and obsession to truly reflect society – what I express is in opposition to the ‘ka pai’ HOPE marketing and propaganda we are subjected to constantly. When those with power exercise censorship and oppression to reject that truth, the psychological impacts for many are toxic rage that will not be silenced – whether we like it or not. For the miserly amount I am given on welfare (most of which my landlord and government get) I spend upward around 90 hours a week working for the good of my community by being focussed on my perspective from the bottom rather than the top. If ACC and others are going to deny people like myself the right to work and live with dignity, then I am going spend every waking hour dedicated to righting that very serious wrong – crime.

 

Please advise if the Councillors intend to redirect efforts of council, Events Centre and Library staff into putting together a professional and effective display of how to participate directly in a democracy. As effective as the work they did catering to the wants of children over the school holidays.

 

My rates spent on sleepovers for stuffed toys, groan, really? Did all those children who participated have safe stable decent homes to live in, with safe stable content parents? The PRIORITIES of our deeply dysfunctional society and those who lead it is the biggest barrier to justice, right, peace and a civilised society.

Sincerely

 

Jayne R

UN Civil Society Activist

 

 

Court today on politically motivated charges for legally protesting

Bit nervous about today, will have to be at court all day cause bail notice says I have to turn up for court at 8.30am and my lawyer from Wellington says he won’t be there until 3.30pm.   I can’t get a Wairarapa lawyer cause they are all bigots and hate intelligent human sewage Civil Society Activists like myself.

Going to take heaps of signs and chalk etc, it is on my bail conditions that I not allowed with 50m of Masterton Police Station except to attend court or see a lawyer.  So we’ll see what happens.  I don’t have enough petrol to go home and come back and I have NOBODY IN MASTERTON I CAN GO AND SEE if they send me away.  I also know from a previous experience, I could very easily go somewhere and start self-harming to cope – which I am sure they are hoping for, they been DYING to get me under compulsory treatment order for years.

Anyway, I never quite know what going to happen in these situations so I will try and not worry about the worse case scenario and take it as it comes.

My new lawyer says he doesn’t want me to turn up and to save my money.   OF COURSE I AM GOING TO BE THERE, like I trust any lawyer in this neo-liberal hell hole!!!!!!!!!!!!!  The guy could be an idiot for all I know.  The bail form says I must be there at 8.30am and that is where I will be until I am seen by a judge.  For my previous five charges and the latest six (all politically motivated and involving public servants or their contractors!)   The police are required by law to be a-political (ie no politics) I am a-political, I don’t believe in politics at all, I only believe in science, truth and Rule of Law.

I reakon some corrupt neo-liberal terrorist at Masterton Police is doing this purposely in order to terrorise me, after all they are the ones who know so much about human behaviour.  They know what they do to me, especially when they ignore my serious complaints of assault and harassment in my home.

 

 

Complaint about judges comments #metoo “It’s a red tape war & I’m a red tape whore.”

Sent this complaint this morning, couldn’t get it off  my mind, so best to do it and get it sent, letter one of my best I reakon.  It’s a red tape war and I’m a red tape whore (c) ReFuSe

26 May 2019

 

Office of the Judicial Conduct Commissioner

PO Box 2661

WELLINGTON

Judicialconduct@jcc.govt.nz

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

It is with the deepest regret and despair I write this complaint after 17 years attempting to get the health care, welfare, housing and justice I am entitled to as a disabled victim of crime in New Zealand. A United Nations Human Rights inspector I met at Te Papa told me to keep making formal complaints so there is a paper trail to follow. Although I am quite sure this valid complaint will fail and I will never get the justice and protection required as a disabled Civil Society Actor – defined by the UN Civil Society Handbook.

 

Years of study, valid complaints of injustice and experience have shown all laws established after the 1984 takeover by radicalised American neo-liberal economic terrorists in New Zealand are designed to defeat justice for the ‘purposely impoverished and persecuted then exploited poor local population’. Commissions are poor man’s justice – ie no justice at all – in fact I find them more proof of widespread government corruption and injustice in a sector.

 

This complaint is justified, as are the other complaints I have made, all ignored of course. Sadly I found myself, after one year studying law at Victoria University 2001, in a 17 year battle for justice for myself and other purposely impoverished, persecuted, criminally neglected victims of crime and trauma. Mostly with ACC, however in fighting for those things I am entitled to under ACC law I was exposed to the extent of neo-liberal/Libertarian corruption and HATE in our society. HATE that grows every day while our most basic constitutional laws are violated (please refer to the Imperial Laws Application Act 1988) – while multiple UN international laws (signed ratified treaties) are also violated.

 

This complaint has its legal origins in Westminster Statute the 1st – common right be done to all rich as poor and the Magna Carta – no person shall be destroyed and every person shall have access to right and justice. I wrote a poem for the 800 year anniversary of the Magna Carta, it can be viewed online at http://jrmurphypoet.com/2015/06/800-years-a-poem-to-commemorate-the-magna-carta-2015/ I was also sent a copy of the speech by grossly corrupt Attorney-General Christopher Finlayson performed at a government comedy event to celebrate it.

 

I feel quite sorry for Judge Barbara Morris having to be the scapegoat for a judiciary who profit from illegally denying people with mental health issues professional health care and necessities of life (eg safe stable affordable housing).

 

WHAT HAPPENED

 

On Thursday 23 May I was in court again trying to get a lawyer after waiting almost 18 months since my first valid protest against illegal police violence in January 2018. Judge Morris knows me quite well after nine years LEGALLY protesting against ACC illegally removing my entitlements and refusing to reinstatement them after winning TWO ACC reviews in 2010/11.

 

Judge Morris made an extremely inappropriate comment about me receiving counselling for the trauma ‘the rapist’ had caused. Firstly she is well aware from my protests that it is far more than counselling I am protesting about. It was established many years ago by health professionals and ACC that COUNSELLING is not sufficient treatment, care or rehabilitation in my particular sensitive claim. There are multiple reports that say this, along with documents I had sent to the judge prior to the hearing. As I am not allowed a lawyer I have been forced to do what I can to defend myself, even when it is extremely harmful and almost impossible to do it, due to impairments related to my disability – Complex PTSD. Part of my CPTSD involves being highly suicidal, CPTSD has a 60% mortality rate due to suicide – inciting someone to suicide is illegal.

 

Part of my CPTSD includes compounding trauma, so when I start bringing up all the deeply distressing injustices I have been subjected to through the justice system I start to become traumatised, have to self-harm etc so I don’t commit suicide (like I have to do multiple times writing this). It is a living nightmare many people in New Zealand are now forced to live with following introduction of neo-liberalism. Wairarapa, where I live, has the highest rate of self-harm in New Zealand, also highest rate of suicide, compulsory treatment orders and prescriptions for psychotropic drugs. I would imagine it also has the most extreme forms of inequality and elitism in New Zealand as well – they must be training rich children to hurt poor people at the multiple private schools here. The elitist hatred is quite obvious to the youth of our region, my children went through the public education system here and told me what they knew about the kids from private schools. It is even more obvious in our community through corrupt elitist neo-liberal organisations such as Trust House and the way ‘community leaders’ advance the rich and persecute the poor.

 

When I was interviewed by a lawyer from the Mental Health Inquiry last year she identified the worst elitism they had so far experienced, after meetings with local community and health leaders earlier in the day. She asked me why I thought it was happening and I told her about the private schools, bias media, inequality between richest and poorest and lack of housing (ie provision for disabled and poor of this region).

 

Elitism is illegal according to NZ Constitutional laws, I continue to wonder why the courts, lawyers and judges allow it. Although statistics about the punishment of beneficiaries (doing what they have to in order to survive and support their children) compared to the punishment of wealthy tax fraudsters tells the true story, also punishments for rapists/criminals who have wealthy powerful family connections).

 

Although the rape, sodomy and not guilty verdict (even when the rapist admitted in court to the jury of 10 white haired old men, one old woman with a blue rinse and one young woman who looked IHC) were what entitled me to ACC, my life-threatening CPTSD is a result of criminal neglect following the crime. I am/was a strong sensible person, bad stuff happens, I know that, I would have recovered from what happened to me if I had received the professional treatment care rehabilitation, safe housing and justice as required under ACC law – and multiple other laws I have read. I can read and comprehend what I read, my mental health issues since the event don’t make me a liar or stupid. In fact based on my extensive knowledge of traumatic stress disorders I would suggest years of severe neglect makes you more intelligent – fighting for your life does that.

 

Many people have been trying to force counselling onto me when the ACC rehabilitation plan illegally removed in 2009 involved around 12 hours a week with a multi-disciplinary team of health professionals and instructed/supported members of the community. I had an Occupational Therapist 2 hrs a week, Psychologist 1 hour, psycho-social rehab at a gym 6 hours, 3 hours a week with a mental health worker and 1 hour a month with a Buddhist massage therapist. I was six months into a 2 ½ year rehabilitation plan when it was illegally removed by ACC GP Peter Jansen. I have seen counsellors through ACC, they were ineffective, most of them would cry once they heard my current living situation, which they obviously could do nothing about, even though they knew it was extremely detrimental to the healing process for victims of crime (ie there are too many serious current traumas to deal with before they can deal with the rape trauma.)

 

Judge Morris should be completely focused on legalities of what is happening to me and how I am presenting in person and with the information I provide her. Her opinion as to my health needs, which she has voiced previously in a closed court based on the experiences of her beloved daughter, is not appropriate. I am a 54 year old women with children and responsibilities of running a household without support from my wealthy parents/family. (Note: my children have left home but of course still need me. My daughter had a life-changing car accident last week – sadly I was not able to be near her as I can’t afford the petrol to get to Whakatane where she now lives.) Being poor insures I am further marginalised, if I had the $10,000 in unpaid Independence Allowance ACC are currently withholding I would have been able to go and see her.

 

Last year lawyers at Masterton Court attempted to force me into something they referred to as a PINC court. Apparently Judge Morris was instrumental in setting this up for PEOPLE IN NEED (People In Need Court). I vehemently refused asserting I was no criminal, my actions in response to gross violations of my rights were completely legal. Also attempting to put me under the grossly corrupt/illegal Mental Health Act 1992 (at the height of National party neo-liberal corruption) to force me to take medication to control me was not going to happen if I could stop it. I am well aware of United Nations international law about my rights to refuse ‘medical treatment’ and why it was implemented after NAZI legalised experimenting on those they chose to persecute – namely disabled who couldn’t work at maximum productivity, govt rape victims, people with brown skin, homeless gypsies, homosexuals and jews.

 

It is interesting to note during consultations for the UN human rights process in New Zealand last year how 95% of the people participating were there about gross violations of human rights against people with mental health issues – particularly abuse victims. People who were not MENTALLY ILL, people who were MENTALLY INJURED as defined by ACC legislation. A normal brain and a normal person experiencing overwhelming trauma – overwhelming trauma that requires a safe place to heal/recover. With neo-liberalism requiring the privatisation and handing over of EVERYTHING TO ‘THE MARKET’, particularly state housing (which is a legal responsibility of the government under international and NZ law) the government stopped providing state housing and sold off everything they possibly could. In the Wairarapa they sold all state housing to either those people in the homes (if they could come up with the money for a deposit) or the ‘pub/gambling charity’ Trust House.

 

There is no need to say what I think of the grossly corrupted, deeply degrading and fraudulent charity industry after 30 years of neo-liberal economic religious beliefs and American Trump advisor Peter Thiel bragging how NZ is a Libertarian utopia – but I will anyway.

 

As you can see from this complaint it is a small/yet extremely significant moment in the gross injustices I experience in the justice, health and welfare systems since 2002. Currently I am excluded from all health services, I have no GP, no health care even when reports say I am very unwell, am disabled and been on invalids benefit for many years. I am not even allowed to phone Healthline I discovered recently, which is quite terrifying and I am sure related to formal complaints I have made about Compass Health board member, government contracted Bell Gully lawyer Simon Watt. Judge Barbara Morris knows about my allegations against Simon Watt, this is part of the information I have given to her in the past few months.

 

Judge Morris also knows I cannot get a lawyer and Forensic Mental Health assessors with conflicts of interest are being used to pervert the course of justice in my case. I currently have a complaint with the medical council about the last assessment and the three inappropriate assessors who agreed to assess me when Medical Council rules plainly state they should withdraw. I won’t go into that as I am becoming very distraught and had to self-harm again.

 

I am quite sure this complaint will be ignored, based on the past 17 years of valid complaints and rejections but if there is any remote chance ‘justice for the poor’ is returning to our legal system then I ask you to uphold my complaint. It seems strange a judge who has publicly identified that mentally ill and poor people are unjustly ending up in the court system and tried to do something about it is the one complained about – one of those neo-liberal abominations I often talk about in my work as a Civil Society Actor. If I had health care so I could return to ‘traditional paid work’ I wouldn’t have time to do as much as I do, wouldn’t you think those in power over me would do something to help me. Perhaps it is part of neo-liberalism for the government to violate the law in order to create jobs and profits for the justice industry and others.

 

Why ACC etc refuse me services was highlighted following the Christchurch Mosque shootings and the need for $millions in charity to support victims. Muslim victims of violent crimes getting help with money, housing, etc while local terrorised population get – counselling. We are No 1 in the world for domestic/flatmate violence, have been for many years due to illegal removal of state housing and people forced into unsafe unstable unaffordable living situations. I have expressed my resentment to Muslim groups involved about all the money and support they are getting. So far rich people have donated $11million, which is being held by government agency Victim Support. Once distributed to the victims of the mosque shootings, I imagine no more than 500 people directly affected that would be $22,000 each – enough for a deposit on a house (so long as they are not permanently disabled as people on welfare ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BORROW MONEY TO LIVE IN THEIR OWN HOME – a violation of disability legislation).

 

I hope with all my heart my complaint is acknowledge and addressed and in doing so will not only change my situation but the situation for approximately 1 million impoverished disabled victims who currently experience 80% of the crime in New Zealand. Sadly Jacinda Ardern deceitfully used these statistics in her propaganda marketing after the mosque shootings as an excuse for complaints in the news from mosque shooting victims.

 

Kia kaha and aroha to the poor and powerless.

Sincerely

JR

Civil Society Actor

HUMAN SEWAGE

 

 

Email to NZ Independent Police Conduct Authority about my latest complaint –

I had to post this email about my latest complaint of police turning up at my home when they not supposed to be here, they wanted it forwarded to the IPCA who sent me a standard email about the process.  The irony of me currently being up on charges for Misuse of a Telephone because of IPCA is hilarious, couldn’t stop myself from writing what I thought.  Can’t imagine what goes through the head of the person who first reads this email, lol.

Dear Corrupt cruel neo-fascist team,

Any organisation that refuses to put a persons name on the letter is corrupt – everybody knows that.  It wasn’t me who made the complaint, I contacted police extremely distraught trying to find an email address for someone in authority who could stop what abusive local police are doing, they are the ones who wanted me to make a formal complaint –  they are the ones who referred it to you not me.   I couldn’t stop crying when they wanted it, because I am currently up on ILLEGAL CRUEL OPPRESSIVE FASCIST criminal charges for the last time I made a complaint of unwarranted violence by local police that you ignored and I phoned you to tell you what I truly thought of you and what should happen to the corrupt people in your organisation.   What happens to me and others I know should be happening to you and those people you know – that would be justice.
Of course there are other factors in my complaint, the years of illegal harassment and intimidation by CORRUPT police officers and IPCA staff allowing it to continue and get worse.  Please refer to all my previous complaints that you refused to do anything about in the hope I will kill myself or commit some violent crime so you can have me locked up and made homeless.
Other factors like Forensic Mental Health Services staff and Directorate of Mental Health staff and Parliamentary Services and senior police participating in perverting the course of justice in my current case – which I am being denied legal aid and a lawyer for – which includes your charge of Misuse of a Telephone.   From one of the corrupt/unprofessional reports I have received it appears there may be people in your organisation also be involved in illegally denying reinstatement of my ACC entitlements (which include $18/wk for the past 10 years) and using the justice process in a punitive way.
It appears from what the officer on the phone told me, local police are well aware they are not to come to my home unless to exercise a warrant – like when they came to terrorise me for the warrant they issued for your trumped up charges – I self-harmed and went through an extremely terrifying suicide episode because of you people – what you do to me is HATE IN ACTION.   Local police are also supposed to phone me if some self-righteous ignorant bigot has called them saying I was threatening to kill myself,  which they didn’t – even that terrifies me but its better than them turning up at my home.  Which is also a gross violation of the Magna Carta and other laws you neo-liberals/neo-fascists ignore in order to advance the rich and persecute the poor so you can profit from them.  I have new neighbours living on both sides of me, they saw those police officers, having police repeatedly at my home ensures I am consistently and over time marginalised and discriminated against.
Just wrote this for a laugh, its all true but I know how corrupt you are so I know nothing is ever going to happen.  A UN inspector told me once to keep making complaints and one day I would get justice and there would be a useful paper trail to follow to prove what has been happening to me as a Civil Society Actor living under Westminister law in a democracy.   Punitive use of the law and justice system to harm a disabled Civil Society Activist fighting for the health care and lawyer she is entitled to – is about as corrupt cruel and immoral as you can get.
Best of luck with that.
Sincerely
JR
Civil Society Activist
HUMAN SEWAGE

From: Independent Police Conduct Authority <case.resolution@ipca.govt.nz>
Sent: Wednesday, 15 May 2019 12:48 PM
To: jrouthan@hotmail.co.nz
Subject:  Your Complaint To IPCA – Ref: 18-2483,
As required by law, your complaint to Police of 10 May 2019, for an incident that occurred on 9 May 2019, was notified by Police to the Authority.
Your complaint will be assigned to a member of staff within the Authority’s Case Resolution Team who will assess your complaint and contact you in due course. This process may take up to two months.
If you have any other information relevant to your complaint that you would like the Authority to consider, please forward this to the Authority at case.resolution@ipca.govt.nz or to P O Box 25221, Wellington 6146.
Please refer to the Authority’s website [www.ipca.govt.nz]www.ipca.govt.nz for further information about the Authority or the complaints process.
Yours sincerely
 

Case Resolution Team

The information in this email (including attachments) is issued for the benefit of the intended recipient only.  It may be subject to legal privilege or protected in terms of the Independent Police Conduct Authority Act 1988.  If you are not the intended recipient, it may be unlawful for you to use any material in this message or to pass it on to others.  If this communication has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete the email immediately; or phone the Authority on 0800 503 728.

Law Society Complaint – ACC lawyers Meredith Connell

JR>
Sent: Friday, 22 September 2017 12:46 p.m.
To: complaints@lawsociety.org.nz
Subject: Complaint about legal firm Meredith Connell & Sean Kinsler

Dear Sir/Madam,

I wish to make a formal complaint about the conduct of Sean Kinsler as agent of ACC in perverting the course of justice with regard to criminal charges I am currently facing regarding my protesting, which I am defending under NZ Bill of Rights.

Mr Kinsler firstly advised ACC to not release the real name of my case manager so she could be subpoenaed as a witness in my current court case – to prove she phoned me in 2015 and told me my care would be reinstated as it had been in 2009 and then didn’t do this.  I don’t care about the woman’s name, I have never hurt anybody, although I do wish harm to people who are terrorising and persecuting me by refusing care when I am very unwell and suffer suicidal ideology.  The also refused the police request for the true identity of the ACC case manager.

In order to argue the case for Misuse of a Telephone (for phoning ACC screaming at them to have my care reinstated when I was very unwell) my lawyer had to have a witness.  When ACC refused to provide the case manager she asked for Scott Pickering – CEO of ACC to be a witness.  With that Police and my lawyer were phoned by Sean Kinsler and threatened that if they tried to do that he would file for a judicial review immediately and my case would be delayed for a very long time.

I have already been waiting over 14 months and my case has been delayed multiple times due to our appallingly busy court system.  I have a life-threatening stress disorder, these delays and the court proceedings cause me extreme distress and significantly aggravate my disorder.  My bulimia is worse, I have started smoking again – which I find very distressing, I am not throwing up enough and eating way to much to cope so I have put on a lot of weight and believe I have developed diabetes (but I don’t have a doctor currently, so I just feel sick most days and my eyes deteriorate- I am working on trying to get a doctor).  Random ticks have returned and so have violent images of knives slicing up my forearms and bleeding out (I just love having to deal with them 10-12 times a day).  Then of course there is the suicidal nightmare of hell.  All the time with NO MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Unable to tell my family or friends how bad things are some times and just trying to keep up appearances and stay alive through it.

Mr Kinsler knows my case, he knows how unwell I am, he knows what ACC have done to me, he has seen the disclosure documents, he is not allowed to be an agent for an extremely rich and powerful government corporation to terrorise a poor disabled person.  The very essence of our law is based on protecting poor and powerless from rich and powerful persecution – and Meredith Connell are participating in it and encouraging it.  That is not the behaviour of an ethical or professional lawyer or legal firm at any time in a democracy or in the Commonwealth.

As a result of this appalling criminal perversion of justice by Mr Kinsler my lawyer was changed the approach to my case significantly and the Misuse of Telephone Charge was dropped – because ACC had been wanting to for months and I had refused, as it was the catalyst for the protests/graffiti and wilful trespass charges I was now facing.  Now the judge won’t get to hear evidence I still believe is essential to my case, although my lawyer Susie Barnes believes we have enough evidence with other charges.

I was enraged by the Misuse of Telephone Charges that started all this when police have refused to act on my multiple complaints of harm by ACC under Sections 150A 151 155 157 of the Crimes Act.  Which if proven could result in criminal charges for ACC staff.  My current lawyer believes she has uncovered appalling behaviour and actions by senior ACC staff in my case – when they knew how unwell I was.

I am also extremely annoyed my case has been delayed so many times and the complete mess the first part hearing of my case was on 29 August – that has  to come back on 31 October 2017 and even then I am told it is going to be extremely rushed.  Although my lawyer is confident I will win on the basis of reasonableness/proportionality and even police prosecutor is appalled at what ACC have done.

My lawyer and police know these proceedings are traumatic for me, they know delays like those threatened by Sean Kinsler would cause me harm, they know how desperate I am to get these things over with.  I shouldn’t even be in court I’ve already won multiple cases of wilful trespass using NZ Bill of Rights.  I shouldn’t even be in court when the process is being used to terrorise me in a punitive way – when I am a recognised disabled Civil Society Actor in the area of mental health and neo-liberalism.

I truly believe the way I am being treated by ACC and Meredith Connell is also related to my political and ethical opinions and terrorising me using police and the justice system as a form of intimidation.  It is illegal to harm someone asserting their civil and political rights, why is this happening to me and has happened multiple times before?

Westminster Statute the First – Common right be done to all rich as poor.  Magna Carta – No-one shall be destroyed and everyone shall have access to right and justice.  YEAH RIGHT!  This is a gross violation of the law and my rights!  What these people have done is illegal!

PLEASE CONTACT ME URGENTLY about this situation so I know what is going on, please advise time frames this complaint will be dealt with and please assure me this complaint isn’t going to derail my current case.  In fact it would be my assertion this needs to be sorted out immediately so my lawyer can question my ACC case manager and Scott Pickering on 31 October and get some more time allocated if required.  Why should I be denied justice because of some mercenary lawyer prepared to do anything his high paying rich violent criminal client says.

Sincerely

JR

Civil Society Actor

Yet another citizens rights document violated by New Zealand Government

I knew this document existed, I tried to find it a few years ago to back up the other laws I had found regarding human, civil and political rights in New Zealand.  I just didn’t have the right name and didn’t realise it was 20 years old – absolutely appalling the violations of it now – especially in my case.

The Universal Declaration on Democracy as signed by all the governments of Commonwealth countries – thoroughly violated in the treatment of disabled and poor people in New Zealand.

http://www.ipu.org/cnl-e/161-dem.htm

We talk about love and compassion in New Zealand, how we need that back in our government – but what most people don’t realise is – what our leaders became was never ever supposed to happen, the poor and powerless were supposed to be protected from cruelty by rich powerful elites and governments.   Max Harris (The NZ Project) talks about bringing love and morals back into politics, but they were always supposed to be there and it was a violation of multiple laws when our leaders lost that and nobody stepped in to stop them.

ANY LAWYERS OUT THERE WANT TO DEBATE ME ON NZ BILL OF RIGHTS being given significant power over the conduct of our government with the support of these signed Declarations – which are not only a contract with the leaders of the Commonwealth and United Nations, they are a contract with the citizens of New Zealand – a contract with me that they are going to adhere to these rules.  Currently they do not and there is nothing people like me can do but challenge this gross miscarriage of justice on every level they can.  No matter how much intimidation the government throw at you.

 

Conviction for Wilful Trespass of ACC – OVERTURNED – BOOM!

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND

WELLINGTON REGISTRY                                                         CRI-2016-485-15

                                                                                                            (2016) NZHC 1495

 

BETWEEN                 JAYNE ROUTHAN

                                    Appellant

 

AND                           NEW ZEALAND POLICE

                                    Respondent

 

Hearing:                      28 June 2016

 

Counsel:                      Bolland

                                    Wood

 

Judgement:                  1 July 2016

 

 

JUDGEMENT OF WILLIAMS J

 

Introduction

 

  1. Following a judge-alone trial in the District Court, Ms Routhan was convicted of trespass.  She represented herself.  Judge Boshier ordered by way of sentence, that she come up to Court for sentence if called upon within nine months.

     

  2. Ms Routhan was convicted pursuant to s3(1) of the Trespass Act 1980.  This provides that it is an offence to trespass on any place and refuse to leave after being warned by an occupier.   This is generally referred to as the ‘single event’ trespass offence.  This is to be constrasted with a s4(4) of the Act.  That provides it is an offence to trespass within two years of having been earlier warned by an occupier to stay off.  That is the ‘two event’ offence.

 

Facts

  1. Ms Routhan was, and remains, very unhappy with various decisions ACC had made about her and wished to protest about this.  At some time between 12pm and 1 pm on 2 September 2015, Ms Routhan visited the Wellington Branch of ACC.  She set herself up in the foyer within the building.  She displayed two placards each containing handwritten text to the general effect that ACC would kill her through bad, lawless or neglectful decisions.  She also displayed a painting in somewhat abstract form of a person with stab wounds in his or her back.  The items embedded in the persons back included a knife on which the letters “ACC” were painted.

     

  2. She sat on the floor in the reception area next to an armchair and a coffee table.  By being located in this spot she blocked the fire exit door.  A security guard repeatedly asked her to leave the premises.  She refused.  The manager was called and she too asked Ms Routhan to leave.  Ms Routhan still refused.  The police were then called.

 

  1. Meanwhile, the building was partially locked down in the sense that reception staff vacated that area and took refuge behind glass doors.  Automatic sliding doors at the entrance to the reception area were then set to exit only.  Ms Routhan would be permitted to leave, but clients could not enter.  Business was brought to a standstill.

 

  1. When the police arrived, they also asked Ms Routhan to leave.  They arrested her when she again refused to do so.

 

District Court Decision

 

  1. The judge summarised the evidence of the security guard, the manager and the arresting constable.  She also summarised Ms Routhan’s evidence.

     

  2. The judge then found that all elements of the offence of one event trespass were met.  The manager had the necessary delegated authority to act as the occupier of the premises.  Both the security guard and the manager had asked Ms Routhan to leave.  She had refused to do so.

 

  1. The judge also recorded the manager’s reasons for asking Ms Routhan to leave was that she was blocking the fire exit,  the placards and painting were disturbing to clients and here was a risk to client and staff safety.  There were also issues, the Judge noted, in terms of the ability of ACC to transact its ordinary business in light of the partial building lock-down.  These factors entitled the manager to ask Ms Routhan to leave the judge found.

 

Submissions and issues

 

  1. Comprehensive and thoughtful submissions were provided by counsel for the appellant raising a number of separate grounds by which, it was argued, the judge’s decision should be overturned.

     

  2. In light of the view I take of this case, only one ground need be discussed.  This relates to the applicability of the reasonableness standard in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZBORA) to decisions to invoke s 3 of the Trespass Act in relation to public buildings.

 

  1. Ms Bolland, for Ms Routhan, argued that Ms Routhan could invoke rights of assembly and expression protected by NZBORA and that this required the officials who involved the Trespass Act to be satisfied that doing so was reasonably necessary in the circumstances.  There was, Ms Bolland submitted, no evidence that officials had made such assessment.  Further, she said, there was no evidence either that Judge Boshier undertook her own analysis of that issue or even understood that NZBORA was relevant.  It followed, Ms Bolland submitted, that the judge had made an error of principle and the conviction should be set aside accordingly.

 

  1. In response, Mr Woods argued that although the judge did not explicitly consider NZBORA or any reasonableness test, she noted that there was evidence of three reasons for the manager asking Ms Routhan to leave and when those reasons taken together, they amounted to sufficient evidence that invoking the Trespass Act was reasonable.  The Judge, in her reasons, took these matters into account.  They were that MS Routhan was blocking the fire exit; the painting showing stab wounds in which ACC was implicated was disturbing for staff and clients; and Ms Routhan’s presence in the building had caused a partial lock-down, interrupting thereby, the ordinary work of the office.  In such circumstances, it was submitted, Ms Routhan’s behaviour was in fact unreasonable, and the corollary was that invoking the Trespass Act was reasonable.  Therefore, even if the Judge had erred, her error would not have affected the result

 

Analysis

 

  1. It is now beyond argument that those exercising public authority may only invoke the Trespass Act against when this is ‘reasonably necessary’, in light of the freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of expression rights protected by ss 14 and 16 of NZBORA.  Kos J in an earlier case involving Ms Routhan provided the following non-exhaustive list of considerations to be factored in to assessing whether invoking the Trespass Act is, in any particular case, reasonable.  They were:
  1. whether the assembly was unreasonably prolonged;

     

  2. the degree to which the rights and freedoms of other people are affected by the trespass notice;

     

  3. the degree to which the assembly or protest interfered with the rights of the occupier to use the premises for ordinary business or duties free of nuisance;

     

  4. the size of the assembly and its duration;

     

  5. the content of what is being expressed, if the message is one of hatred, racial abuse, intolerance or obscenity; and

     

  6. whether the notice is justified on the grounds of maintenance of public order (such as lack of prior notice to police of the time and location of the event or in terms of management of street traffic).

     

  1. In my view it is plain that Judge Boshier was unaware that NZBORA rights were in play even though the matter had been raised both in evidence and argument.  For that reason, she did not subject the case to the justified limitations analysis required by s 5 of the Act.  That is (in short) that Ms Routhan’s freedom to express her views in government spaces could only be curtailed if this amounted to a reasonable limit, prescribed by law and “demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society”.

     

  2. It follows that the judge necessarily made an error of principle.

 

  1. But was Mr Woods right when he argued that the error was not material because, on the facts, such limitation was reasonable?  This question requires me to assess, in hindsight, the relevant facts alluded to by the Judge.  I am inevitably drawn into making my own assessment in light of the Judge’s failure to do so at first instance.

 

  1. In my view it cannot be said that trespassing Ms Routhan, in the circumstances that obtained on the day in question in the reception area, was reasonable.  She sat there quietly expressing her views that she was entitled to express in terms of s 14 of NZBORA.  She was not aggressive or violent.  She said nothing unless spoken to.  She made it clear that in her view she had a right to do what she was doing.

 

  1. The written placards were not offensive.  The painting was not either.  I accept that the painting might have been if the image had been a photo of a human body with gaping knife wounds, but it was not.  Whatever its merits, it was an abstract work of art and protest.  No reasonable person could have viewed it as offensive.  It is true that the building went into semi lock-down as a result of Ms Routhan’s presence in the reception area.  But that was ACC’s response to Ms Routhan’s presence.  That response too has to be measured against a reasonableness standard.  Mr Woods said that ACC had had experience of Ms Routhan’s protests in the past and management responded as much to their experience of her as they did to her actions on the day.  Whatever Ms Routhan had done in the past, she was being very careful to behave civilly, courteously and reasonably on the day in question.  If she had come to learn where the line was, beyond which freedom of expression crossed into unreasonable interference in the lives of others, then it seems to me that was a good outcome.  She ought not to be prejudiced for having learnt to modify her behaviour so as not to offend, annoy or be a nuisance.

 

  1. Finally, and perhaps most powerfully from ACC’s perspective, MS Routhan was, it was said, blocking a fire exit.  This, it must be accepted, could amount to unreasonable interference with staff and public use of the area.  But whether invoking the Trespass Act is a reasonable response requires a general consideration of the reasonable alternatives that would have been available to officials.  An obvious one comes to mind.  Either the security guard of the manager (or the Police for that matter) could have advised MS Routhan that she was entitled to sit silently and express her views through her placards and painting, but she could not block the fire exit.  An invitation to move a metre or two to the left or right was all that was required.  If she refused, then unreasonable interference in the use of the public space is necessarily established.  If she acceded to the request, then she was safely on her side of the freedom of expression/trespass divide.  There was no evidence of such an invitation being made to Ms Routhan.

 

  1. The appeal must be allowed accordingly.  The conviction and sentence are quashed.

 

J WILLIAMS  

 

 

                                   

Social Security Legislation Rewrite Act Submission, all punitive changes illegal!

If you are reading this and want to make a submission please follow the link below, last day today, every voice counts.  Below that is my submission if you would like some ideas.

http://www.parliament.nz/en-nz/pb/legislation/bills/00DBHOH_BILL68669_1/social-security-legislation-rewrite-bill

SUBMISSION ON SOCIAL SECURITY REWRITE

SUBMISSION ON SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION REWRITE BILL

JR

Early last year I was doing some research for my own legal issues when I came across copies of the Social Security Act and noted with distress the long list of amendments to this piece of legislation.  Now I see the government have become ashamed of this list and want to tidy it up.  Perhaps so it isn’t obvious to future generations how the rich and powerful in New Zealand/the world persecuted the poorest sector of our society, using neo-liberal economic policies and radicalised political beliefs they knew were harmful. 

 It is common knowledge that neo-liberals deregulated the finance industry, removed tariffs and implemented GST, cut taxes to the rich, etc etc.  They created unemployment and a low wage economy, then went about creating propaganda that it was the fault of the unemployed for their situation.

 I am an active protester in the area of mental health services for mentally injured abuse victims and mentally ill.  I am being persecuted through the justice and health system for legally protesting and not treated with impunity as required by the United Nations, as a civil society actor.  In the work that I do, which includes a significant amount of law I have been introduced to Imperial Laws.  Firstly Westminster Statute 1st, Common right be done to all, rich as poor and Secondly Magna Carta, No man shall be destroyed and every man shall have access to right and justice.

 It is quite obvious from the number of changes to the Social Securities Act that were designed to degrade and intimidate that these changes are supposed to be punitive against poor people.  At the same time we pass laws that advance rich people like those passed to advance The Hobbit and Hollywood multinationals.  This IS NOT COMMON RIGHT BEING DONE TO ALL – this is rich being advanced and poor disadvantaged.

 Throughout history mankind have shown they cannot control their love of money and power, to the detriment of society, that is why we have laws.  That is why we live in a civilized society and democracy, in an effort to control this propensity for abuse of power and strong attacking weak.  This is no longer happening, those with money and power have created extreme suffering, that is leading to social issues, violence, addiction, suicide, etc.  Their radicalised political belief that those who don’t work are bludgers and a drain on society is immoral and an act of discrimination in my culture.

 These same people who don’t work are not given the opportunity as cuts to funding for professional treatment care and rehabilitation mean there is no support.  ACC and mental health do not use professional rehabilitation models, I know this for a fact, I studied this topic at Massey University.  All the talk about people with disabilities being in work, are just not a reality in a neo-liberal capitalist society.  Jobs need to be created for disabled people to use their talents, within their capabilities and create value in society.  So many disabled people with so much talent – especially with people who have mental health issues, many highly intelligent and being left to rot.

 The focus on work is offensive, while ACC, mental health and others ensure people are not treated, protected, cared for and rehabilitated as required under the IPRCA.  Also as required under Health, Disability, Criminal, Human Rights and Bill of Rights Acts.

 Again I would point out it is the fact that at the same time as resources were being taken from the most vulnerable and poorest people, those who were the richest were increasing their wealth according to data.

 I will say it simply – you are not allowed to use the law to advance the rich and persecute the poor – people must be advanced, or not, in a common way.  As I know in my case this is happening I understand the law to be interpreted that I no longer have to respect or adhere to the law under the Westminster System.

 The consolidation of this Act is immoral and illegal.  I am also quite sure the government will bring something more degrading in for beneficiaries, even though they say they are not going to – they always do – it is modern day oppression of mostly disabled citizens.

 That people in power, with access to scientific evidence about the social dysfunction etc poverty and inequality create, continue to harm vulnerable minorities makes me want to be ill.  It is a gross miscarriage of justice that is somehow being legitimised by the media and all neo-liberals and worst of all by our justice agencies.  We have Criminal Laws and Bill of Rights Act that few people can use to protect themselves against cruel immoral radicalised political terrorists who work for government organisations.  Under the Terrorism Suppression Act, what neo-liberals have done over the past 30 years constitutes terrorism, especially in the area of destroying mental health infrastructure and causing serious harm to a significant targeted group of the population. 

 I also have Christian beliefs and know it is EVIL to advance and protect the rich and powerful, while they degrade, disenfranchise and persecute the vulnerable poor.  Westminster Law is based on Christianity, so is our monarchy and I expect to have New Zealand’s cultural, religious and ethical beliefs respected and acknowledged in this debate/law change.

 Now I have pointed out rich people can’t use the law to harm poor people I expect there will be a police and GCSB investigation – perhaps a Royal Commission of Inquiry.  That this bill will not progress and there will be urgent legislation enacted to remove any parts of the Social Security Act implemented since Rogernomics/neo-liberalism that has harmed the poorest of citizens.  That of course would involve a return to welfare and housing conditions prior to Ruth Richardson.

 All these punitive laws that were made are illegal and we must (now we understand what has happened and how it happened) strike them down and return to the law prior.  The poorest New Zealanders must be advanced in common right as rich people were, to do anything else is uncivilized and against Westminster Law and democracy.

 I wish to speak to my submission in person.

 June 2016

 

Spent 5 hrs police cells under mental health act for protesting at Police HQ New Zealand

Could someone outside New Zealand PLEASE DO SOMETHING – people in power here are completely fkd and very very good at hiding it.  Seems only when international media etc get hold of a story that they actually do something!  This just tip of the iceberg, 20 police ‘welfare’ visits to my home in past six months, am having nightmares – please someone make them stop.  All I am doing is begging for the health care and justice I am entitled to, then these people phone the police to intimidate me but do nothing to reinstate the health care I’m supposed to be receiving BY LAW.



Sent: Thursday, 12 May 2016 8:36 a.m.
To: tusha.penny@police.govt.nz
Subject: Fw: Formal complaint about being detained under mental health act as a form of intimidation

 

Of course you know this was partly to do with you ignoring me Tusha – I WANT A VOICE – I NEED A VOICE – what I know and what is happening to me is based on science and current legislation, I am an expert in this field – the longer I am censored and not heard the angrier I get and more intense my protests will become.

 

The current NZ Herald campaign is infuriating me, it is such a bunch of rhetoric, so much opinionated misinformation and lies.

 

I want some sort of investigation into what happened and who this person was telling police to detain me under mental health act for my justified protest.  Our society cannot keep suppressing the truth about how NZ government actions over the past 30 years have fuelled this culture of violence – how unprofessional inadequate mental health services and people forced to live in inhuman conditions so stressed to breaking create this violence.  Also addiction and suicide – as I am sure you know.

 

Seeing Mike Bush in the campaign photo for #betterthanthis made me want to be sick – of course we’re not better than this, we are this and successive governments have created it -but take no responsibility for it and dump blame on their victims.

 

People like that security officer are unable to accept the rage, distress, accountability and FACTS I challenge those in authority with – they like to pretend everything is great in New Zealand and people like me don’t exist.  It is imperative I do what I do according to the Milgram Experiment and even my new lawyer who said people like me are essential in a civilized society.

 

Please be aware I am petrified scared of mental health services, much more than any organisation, I have been treated so badly by them and lies spread in the community by the mental health team.  I have been denied care at some of my most desperate moments and didn’t react well to them in the cells either.  Awesome that the supervising officer (in black) allowed me to speak freely, I told them exactly what I thought of mental health services.  Advised them they were getting the result of years of hatred and psychological torture by other mental health workers, also my rage at what they were doing to me and so many others.  Sometimes I think these officers are thinking to themselves how much they wish they could say the same things I do.

 

Sincerely

 

Jayne



Sent: Thursday, 12 May 2016 8:20 a.m.
To: enquiries@ipca.govt.nz
Subject: Formal complaint about being detained under mental health act as a form of intimidation

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Yesterday I was detained in the cells for 5 hours under the mental health act – Section 109 it was referred to repeatedly by officers.  I treat having my freedom taken from me seriously and so does the law.

 

This was as a result of a protest I was doing at Police Headquarters in Wellington about corruption, rich vs poor, magna carta violations, medical neglect, psychological torture, criminal negligence and abuse in ACC and mental health services against disabled mentally injured abuse victims and mentally ill people.  This is the topic I protest about on an regular basis, this is what I am an expert in, this is what I am subjected to and this is what most know is the reality of our appalling ACC and mental health system.

 

I don’t deny I ‘LOST IT’ and couldn’t stop swearing (I now have a tourettes type disorder) so should have been taken away from the scene.  This is an informal agreement I have with the police when I am so angry about what is happening to me and what is happening to people I know.  This particular event was triggered by yet another police visit to my home – number 20 I think it is now, threatening action for begging for police to help me and act on my complaints of harm by ACC and mental health under sections 150A 151 155 and 157 of the Crimes Act – while at the same time dragging me through court for a minor charge of screaming at ACC for help.  Also the current NZ Herald misleading government propaganda marketing campaign about violence in our society.

 

What should have happened is I should have been arrested for disorderly behaviour, spent 2 hours in the cells and released with a pre-charge warning, when I had calmed down a bit.  Instead what happened was a person at the scene who said he was a diplomatic security officer instructed the police officer to have me detained under Section 109 – mental health act, the officer did as he was told.  This man had only minutes previously been insulting me and ‘winding me up’ even more with his sarcasm.  I objected to his vindictive insulting suggestion and act of serious intimidation under Bill of Rights but was ignored.  I want this matter investigated and this security guard sacked for his appalling behaviour.

 

Where did this man get his authority over police?  Is this another example of a rich person getting superior rights to a poor person, which is against Westminster law?  It is certainly another act of intimidation for my justified angry protests about what is happening to me and so many other disabled abuse victims in our cruel corrupt society.  Threatening someone who is protesting with being ‘locked up’ and drugged up under the mental health act is an extremely intimidating act.

 

There was a struggle with the police officer at Police Headquarters and this security man, which has covered me in bruises, was traumatising and did not need to happen, when I am arrested I go peacefully with any officer, I know the process and I expect it to be followed.  I have this issue with laws not being followed by people in authority when I am expected to follow them.

 

I am a civil society actor with a disability I know the process so well now that I know what happened during this arrest was not right and not legal.  After I was arrested/detained I was compliant with officers, was not handcuffed, did not swear but was repeatedly objected to what was happening under Bill of Rights, Human Civil and Political Rights.

 

The CATT team /mental health came and went as I knew they would.  When I was being released I was told what a pleasure it is to deal with me.  Police, other than this security person were awesome, as almost all of them are – why wouldn’t they be, they agree with what I’m protesting about, they’re dealing with mentally ill people who cannot get services every day – like the woman in the cell beside me.

 

I look forward to your investigation and action on this complaint.

 

JR

CIVIL SOCIETY ACTOR

HUMAN SEWAGE

PERSECUTED WHISTLEBLOWER